Skip to content

[CHIA-3609] Port get_offer(s) to @marshal #20062

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: quex.port_take_offer_to_marshal
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[CHIA-3609] Port get_offer(s) to @marshal #20062

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Quexington
Copy link
Contributor

Another PR following #18593

@Quexington Quexington requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2025 18:43
@Quexington Quexington added the Changed Required label for PR that categorizes merge commit message as "Changed" for changelog label Sep 12, 2025
@Quexington Quexington force-pushed the quex.port_take_offer_to_marshal branch from 76dd3e2 to 9c3ef2f Compare September 15, 2025 21:28
@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge_conflict Branch has conflicts that prevent merge to main label Sep 15, 2025
@Quexington Quexington force-pushed the quex.port_get_offer_s_to_marshal branch from 825ad74 to 9ad6880 Compare September 15, 2025 21:30
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge_conflict Branch has conflicts that prevent merge to main label Sep 15, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

File Coverage Missing Lines
chia/cmds/wallet_funcs.py 66.7% lines 796
chia/wallet/wallet_rpc_api.py 92.3% lines 2368
Total Missing Coverage
77 lines 2 lines 97%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Changed Required label for PR that categorizes merge commit message as "Changed" for changelog coverage-diff
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Quexington